(3-4) pages.
Criteria: This essay will in fully demonstrate the ideas and rhetorical strategy of comparison/contrast as discussed in class. The essay will be a minimum of 3-4 pages in length and will follow the essay manuscript guidelines provided. The information presented in your essays must be original.
Do not use outside research for this paper. You are required to write either a comparative essay or a contrast essay; however, should you decide to write both a comparison and contrast essay. Regardless of your choice, your final grade will be based on how well your essay is written.
Choose one of the following topics:
Essay Due Dates:
Draft of comparison and contrast essay due (3 copies): Tuesday, Mar. 10, 2020
Final draft of comparison and contrast essay due (instructor’s marked draft and final paper: Thursday, Mar. 26, 2020
Objectives: At the end of this unit, you will be able to:
— Explain how the comparison/contrast thesis statement differs from other forms of thesis statements
— Identify transitional words/phrases used in comparison and contrast essays
— Identify bases for comparison or contrast
–Define analogy
— Explain the block method of organisation, its advantages and limitations
— Explain the point-by-point method of organisation, its advantages and limitations
— Explain the primary steps used in developing comparison/contrast essays
— Write a successful comparison or contrast essay that demonstrates many of the aforementioned elements
— Name and explain a practical, “real world” application for comparison/contrast
What is Comparison /Contrast?
Comparison/contrast is the examination of the similarities and/or differences between people, objects, or ideas, in order to arrive at a judgement or conclusion.
When we compare or contrast two items, we want to be able to see very clearly the points of comparison or contrast so that we may judge which item is better or worse than the other in some respect.
The process of comparison gives us a deeper understanding of the subject and enables us to make well-researched decisions rather than being at the mercy of a clever salesperson or being convinced by a good price or some other feature that might strike us at first glance.
Choosing the Two Part Topic
The problem with writing a good comparison or contrast essay usually centres on the fact that you now have a two-part topic. This demands very careful attention to the thesis statement.
While you must be careful to choose two subjects that have enough in common to make them comparable, you must also not choose two things having so much in common that you cannot possibly handle all the comparable points in one essay.
Once you have chosen a two-part topic that you feel is not too limiting and not too broad, you must remember that a good comparison or contrast essay should devote an equal or nearly equal amount of space to each of the two parts. If the writer is only interested in one of the topics, the danger is that the essay will end up being very one-sided.
Here’s an example of a one-sided contrast:
While American trains go to only a few towns, are infrequent, and are often shabby and uncomfortable, the European train is much nicer.
The following example is a better written contrast that gives attention to both topics:
While American trains go to only a few large cities, run very infrequently, and are often shabby and uncomfortable, European trains go to virtually every small town, are always dependable, and are clean and attractive.
Exercise 1: Evaluating the Two-Part Topic
Study the following topics and decide whether each topic is too broad for an essay, or whether it is suitable as a topic for an essay of comparison or contrast.
Topic Too Broad Suitable
Topic Too Broad Suitable
champagne
taking photographs using available light
Two Approaches to Ordering Material
The first method for ordering material in an essay of comparison or contrast is known as the point-by-point method. When you use this method, you compare a point of one topic with a point of the other topic. The following paragraph offers an example of the point-by-point method.
My husband and I constantly marvel at the fact that our two sons, born of the same parents and only two years apart in age, are such completely different human beings. The most obvious differences became apparent at their births.
Our firstborn, Mark, was big and bold—his powerful, chunky legs gave us the impression he could have walked out of the delivery room on his own.
Our second son, Wayne, was delightfully different. Rather than having the football physique that Mark was born with, Wayne came into the world with a long, slim, wiry body more suited to running, jumping, and contorting. Wayne’s eyes, rather than being intense like Mark’s, were impish and innocent.
When Mark was delivered, he cried only momentarily, and then seemed to settle into a state of intense concentration, as if trying to absorb eh could about the strange, new environment he found himself in. Conversely, Wayne screamed from the moment he first appeared. There was nothing helpless or pathetic about his cry either—he was darn angry!
–student
The next paragraph uses the block method of organisation. The writer discusses the first topic in its entirety (games), offers a transition, and then fully discusses the second topic (business).
Games are of limited duration, take place on or in fixed and finite sites, and are governed by openly promulgated rules that are enforced on the spot by neutral professionals.
Moreover, they’re performed by relatively evenly matched teams that are counselled and led through every move by seasoned hands. Scores are kept, and at the end of the game, a winner is declared.
Business is usually a little different. In fact, if there is anyone out there who can say that the business is of limited duration, takes place on a fixed site, is governed by openly promulgated rules that are enforced on the spot by neutral professionals, competes only on relatively even terms, and performs in a way that can be measured in runs or points, then that person is either extraordinarily lucky or seriously deluded.
–Warren Bennis, “Time to Hang Up the Old Sports Cliches”
In the textbook, A Short History of the Movies, author Gerald Mast devotes one of his chapters to explaining the difference between the two masters of comedy:
Mack Sennett, the man who created the Keystone Kops, and Charlie Chaplin, the love able tramp who could make people laugh and cry at the same time. Sometimes the author uses the block method; sometimes he uses the point-by-point method. Sometimes in an essay he uses both. Notice the effectiveness of each approach:
Block Method
Some of the differences between Sennett and Chaplin become clear when comparing similar devices and motifs they both used. Both Sennett and Chaplin used cops. For Sennett, the cops were purely comic characters, whose good will was balanced by their efforts and frenzy; Sennett’s cops can do nothing right.
Their cars crash, their boats sink; they fall all over each other as they swarm to answer a call. They are as earnest and as functional as toy soldiers. Chaplin’s cops, though not precisely what contemporary radicals would call pigs, were not far from it. In Police, the cops spend their time leisurely journeying by motor car to answer an emergency call for help; they drink tea and fluff their uniforms and show no concern at all for Edna’s distress.
The cops in The Adventurer are not as satirical, but they do shoot rifles at the escaping Charlie, and their bullets look as though they could kill….
Point-By-Point Method
Temperamentally, Chaplin could never see comedy the way Sennett saw it. For Sennett, the comic world was a world of silly surfaces; for Chaplin the comic world was a way at getting at the serious world of men and society. For Sennett, comedy was an end; for Chaplin, it was a means both Sennett and Chaplin use the ocean; for Sennett the ocean is a location for watery gags, but for Chaplin the
ocean is a place where people can drown. Both Sennett and Chaplin use the chase, but Sennett emphasises more of the pure motion and frenzy of it; whereas, Chaplin emphasises the cleverness and skill of Charlie at avoiding capture….
Alternating or Point-By-Point Outline
Basis of Comparison?
III. Similarity or Difference 2
Basis of Comparison?
Basis of Comparison?
Block Method Outline
Basis of Comparison?
7
III. Second Subject
Basis of Comparison?
Basis of Comparison?
Guidelines for Writing the Comparison/Contrast Essay
Common Transitions
For Comparison for Contrast similar to on the contrary though similarly on the other hand unlike like in contrast with even though likewise in spite of nevertheless just like despite however just as instead of but furthermore, different from otherwise moreover whereas except for equally while and yet again although still also too so Pitfalls to Avoid
with the movie adaptation, you need to provide equal treatment for both the novel and the movie.
Analogy
An analogy is an extended comparison between objects or ideas from different classes—things not normally associated. Analogy is particularly effective in explaining unfamiliar or abstract concepts because a comparison can be drawn between what is familiar and what is not. An analogy often begins with a simile or a metaphor, as in the following paragraph.
Casual dress, like casual speech, tends to be loose, relaxed, and colourful. It often contains what might be called “slang words”: blue jeans, sneakers, baseball caps, aprons, flowered cotton house-dresses, and the like.
These garments could not be worn on a formal occasion without causing disapproval, but in ordinary circumstances, they pass without remark. “Vulgar words” in dress, on the other hand, give emphasis and get immediate attention in almost any circumstances, just as they do in speech.
Only the skilful can employ them without some loss of face, and even then, they must be used in the right way. A torn, unbuttoned shirt or wildly uncombed hair can signify strong emotions: passion, grief, rage, despair. They’re most effective if people already think of you as being neatly dressed, just
as the curses of well-spoken persons count for more than those of the customarily foul-mouthed do.
–Alison Lurie, The Language of Clothes
Exercise 2: Analogies
Here are some well-known analogies from literature. Read them carefully. Determine what each writer wished to explain and then point out the way in which the analogy is limited.