- Premium SEO Articles Help From Experts
- +1 979 633 4729
- admin@supportprofessor.com
Pay for Performance Research Assignment
Overview
Pay for Performance in America’s public schools is an extremely controversial issue. Although the process has made inroads in business and is a means to help determine promotions, pay, and retention it has not been so well received in the public-school systems.
However, there are some successful examples where teacher pay has been linked to student test scores. In Minnesota for example, some districts have stopped giving automatic raises for seniority and base 60% of all pay increases on employee performance.
In Denver, unions and school districts designed an incentive program where teachers receive bonuses for student achievement and for earning national teaching certificates. However, some plans have not worked.
For example, Cincinnati teachers voted against a merit pay proposal and Philadelphia teachers gave their bonus checks to charity rather than cashing them. It appears that having teachers involved in planning the incentive system is one key factor to success. The same can be said for all incentive plans – if employees don’t buy into them, they will not work.
Questions to Research: 1. How could an organization measure the effectiveness of their pay-for-performance plans? 2. From an employee’s perspective, what are the disadvantages of using a pay-for-performance plan? 3. From an employer’s perspective, what are the disadvantages of using a pay-for-performance plan?
Tip from your Professor: How does Pay for Performance (PfP) apply to the business world. The example given is about the school system, but the discussion is to be centered around pay for performance in organizations in general, not the school system. Please note the three prompts do not have the word “school” anywhere in them. The focus is on PfP, NOT the school system. Research Paper Instructions:
Your paper should be a minimum of eight (8) full pages of double written content work in 12-point font. In addition, include a properly formatted APA cover page, an abstract, a properly formatted Introduction and Conclusion, and a minimum of 5 references to support your ideas, arguments, and opinions. Your paper should analyze all required readings and those from your research in the field of study.
You are expected to conduct outside research aside from the text to support your ideas, arguments, and opinions. Discussions of key concepts, and a critical analysis of the research is required. Remember you are to critically analyze the data you find. Merely copying pasting and citing sources does not constitute scholarly writing.
You must present ideas and positions and support or refute those arguments with credible references and sources. While assigned readings are important; you must conduct independent research of the subject matter and critically analyze the materials presented. References and sources should support your ideas, arguments, and opinions;
and not be the basis of your paper. The assignment should be a scholarly paper that is designed to analyze and academically discuss what you have learned and how you can integrate the learning into an organization now and in the future. Be sure to list references in proper APA format and ensure that all listed references are also cited in text.
References and citations must be congruent, meaning all listed sources are cited in text and cited sources are listed in the references section at the end of your paper.
Your paper should adhere to APA formatting requirements (APA style cover page, in-text citations for each listed reference, and a reference page are required). Please make sure to proofread carefully. Grammar and spelling errors will affect the grading. It is very important that your critical analysis relates the course content to real-world applications from your work experiences or current events affecting HRM practices.
| HRMT600 Writing Rubric 100 % | ||||||
| Exemplary 4 pts | Accomplished 3.4 pts | Developing 3 pts | Beginning 2.6 pts | Did not attempt 0 pts | ||
| Abstract 10 % | Exemplary
Places Abstract on a separate page & clearly summarizes the intent and content of the paper in 150 – 250 words |
Accomplished
Places Abstract on a separate page & summarizes the intent and content of the paper is 150 – 250 words |
Developing
Abstract is vague and does not summarize the intent or content of the paper well. Paper is either less than 150 or more than 250 words. |
Beginning
Abstract is present but, incomplete or ambiguous. Intent of the paper is obscure and confusing. |
Did not attempt
Not attempted or provided. |
|
| Introduction 15 % Provides a clear and concise reason for the paper and background into the problem. | Exemplary
Provides background research into the problem; states the problem clearly; justifies the study; explains the significance of the problem to an audience of non-specialists. |
Accomplished
Provides background research into the topic; describes the problem to be solved; provides findings and reasons for the research. |
Developing
Provides little background research into the topic; describes the problem to be solved; provides little findings and reasons for the research. |
Beginning
Student does not identify the purpose or provide background information for the paper. The introduction is vague and unclear in its purpose. |
Did not attempt
Not attempted or provided. |
|
| Discussion 35 % Discusses findings and conclusions in accordance with the research. | Exemplary
Presents precise and orderly explanation of findings in conjunction with the research despite personal opinions and ideas. Provides at least the minimum written content in accordance with assignment instructions. |
Accomplished
Presents explanation of findings and research. Provides at least the minimum written content in accordance with assignment instructions. |
Developing
Does not address the problem statement effectively. Research does not support findings or arguments. Conclusions not clearly stated. Provides between 70% to 85% of minimum written content required. |
Beginning
Work is confusing and intelligible. Paper loses focus and does not address the subject matter. Research is vague and confusing. Provides less than 70% of the minimum written content requirement. |
Did not attempt
Not attempted or provided. |
|
| Summary or Conclusion 15 % Articulates findings in accordance with the research. | Exemplary
Restates the reason for the paper. Clearly and precisely articulates and summarizes findings and outcomes in accordance with the research; regardless of personal views or opinions. |
Accomplished
Restates the reason for the paper as well as articulates and summarizes findings and outcomes in accordance with the research. |
Developing
Attempts but does not clearly summarize the paper adequately or explain findings. |
Beginning
Attempts, but summary is confusing and lacks detail. Findings are unclear and lacks detail. |
Did not attempt
Not attempted or provided. |
|
| Documentation & APA format. 20 % Paper is properly in APA style writing standards | Exemplary
Paper is written in proper APA format; includes at least the minimum number of references and sources; references are properly listed in the Reference section and properly cited in text. |
Accomplished
Paper written mostly in proper APA format. Reference listing and citations contain errors but they don’t represent a major distraction. Provides at least 60% of the references required. |
Developing
Student has trouble with APA formatting and listing and citing sources and references. Provides at least 33% to 59% of required references. |
Beginning
Some attempt to write in APA format, however student struggles with listing and citing sources in text. Less than 33% of required references are provided. |
Did not attempt
No attempt to write in APA format; references and sources are not provided or not listed or cited. |
|
| Grammar and Spelling 5 % Submission if free of grammar and spelling errors | Exemplary
Paper is free or almost free of grammatical errors and writing mechanics. |
Accomplished
Paper contains minor errors in grammar and spelling, but does not present significant distraction from the work. |
Developing
Paper contains several grammatical and spelling errors that begin to distract from the work. |
Beginning
Paper contains many grammatical and spelling errors distracting significantly from the work. |
Did not attempt
Paper contains so many errors in grammar and spelling that the intent of the paper cannot be understood. |
