Overview
A fundamental aspect of nursing informatics is project implementations based on technology for patient care problems. The American Nurses Association (ANA) Scope and Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice requires the Nurse Informaticist to propose, implement, and evaluate technological advances for quality patient care.
The Quality and Safety Education for Nursing’s (QSEN) pre-licensure Informatics competencies relate to how informatics supports safe, quality patient care through the following:
For this assignment, you will develop a proposal for a new technology that is currently not being used in your area of nursing practice. Keep in mind that technology has some form of electronic component to it for this paper.
Starting with the need, identify why the need exists for the new technology. What data is collected that tells you a problem exists? How will this technology answer the problem? Provide an analysis of the current situation and potential opportunity for improving patient care.
With any new technology project, there must be stakeholder identification, an identification of quality indicators, projected benefits, consideration for training, and evaluation of outcomes.
Write a 6–10-page formal APA paper that describes the new technology following the directions below. This does not include title page and references. The 6-10 range allows you to expand or contract your paper and gives you some leeway on the total number of pages.
The purpose of this assignment is to encourage a depth and breadth of understanding about new technology and the impact on patient care. This assignment allows insight into the many facets of bringing about change from inception to evaluation.
This assignment is 20 points, or 20% of your final grade.
Directions
NUR 451 Nursing Informatics
1
What data is currently collected that demonstrates a problem exists? For example, you might discuss how the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid will no longer reimburse for specific processes of care or patient outcomes (falls, pressure ulcers, etc.).
The data should relate back to the problem you identified with the technological solution. In a later section you will provide specific rates for your area of practice. Here, you will provide national rates or incidence, if available.
When writing this section, consider who is affected by your project? Who needs to be involved in the buy-in, use, purchase, upkeep, management, training, and evaluation of the technology? This may include technical support, nurses from specific areas, managers,
information technology, bio-med, central supply, pharmacists, physicians, nursing assistants, unit secretaries, etc. Consider the following questions while writing this section:
Grading Rubric
Use this rubric to guide your work on Assignment #3:
Tasks | Accomplished | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Acceptable |
Background | Fully describes and develops the context of the problem that the technology intends to solve | Introduces the technology but does not address one of the following
Significance of problem |
Introduces the technology but does not address two of the following
Significance of problem |
Briefly introduces the technology but does not address the following
Significance of problem |
Details significance of problem with appropriate and relevant references
Includes appropriate data |
Includes appropriate data
5 references for background and technology |
Includes appropriate data
5 references for background and technology |
Includes appropriate data
5 references for background and technology |
|
5 references for background and technology | ||||
5 Points | 6-5 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 0 |
Quality
5 Points |
Fully examines the effect on:
· Process of care · Quality patient outcomes · Patient safety · Provides current data that reflects the problem 6-5 |
Some examination of the areas and/or missing information on one area.
· Process of care · Quality patient outcomes · Patient safety · Provides current data that reflects the problem 4-3 |
Limited examination and/or missing information in one to two areas.
· Process of care · Quality patient outcomes · Patient safety · Provides current data that reflects the problem 2-1 |
Weak examination of the areas and/or missing information in more than 2 areas.
· Process of care · Quality patient outcomes · Patient safety · Provides current data that reflects the problem 0 |
Stakeholders | Clearly identifies | Briefly identifies | Missing some | Cursory overview of |
stakeholders, their | stakeholders, their | aspect of identifying | stakeholders, their | |
role, how to gain | role, how to gain | stakeholders, their | role, how to gain | |
their buy in for the | their buy in for the | role, how to gain | their buy in for the | |
technology, and | technology, and | their buy in for the | technology, and | |
provides a clear | provides a clear | technology, and | provides a clear | |
rationale for | rationale for | provides a clear | rationale for | |
inclusion. | inclusion. | rationale for | inclusion. |
5 Points | 6-5 | 4-3 | inclusion.
2-1 |
0 |
Evaluation
5 Points |
Thorough explanation of the evaluation including data sources, types of data, and responsible persons for collecting and reporting data | Brief explanation of the evaluation including data sources, types of data, and responsible persons for collecting and reporting data | Missing one element of the evaluation including data sources, types of data, and responsible persons for collecting and reporting data | Missing more than one element of the evaluation including data sources, types of data, and responsible persons for collecting and reporting data |
7-6 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0 | |
APA Format, Spelling, Grammar
3 |
Title page, references, and body of paper have 0-3 separate APA errors | Title page, references, and body of paper have 4-7 separate APA errors | Title page, references, and body of paper have 8-10 separate APA errors | Title page, references, and body of paper have more than 11 separate APA errors |
3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
References 2 | 5 references from peer-reviewed journals | Less than 5 references from peer-reviewed journals | ||
2 | 0 | |||
Total Points 30 |